A shocking incident unfolded last week: a 50-year-old Saudi Arabian man drove his car into a Christmas market, killing and injuring innocent families. He claimed to be an "anti-Muslim activist." Does that narrative add up?—NO, if he were truly an anti-Muslim activist, wouldn't his target have been a mosque and Muslim people? And why did he scream Allahu Ackbar when he was arrested?
Let’s call it what it is: another tragic act by someone lost in Satan's darknest spirit, perpetuating violence. This tragedy also underscores the irony of Angela Merkel’s recent success. Her memoir, Freedom, has become the bestselling book of 2024 in Germany, selling 200,000 copies in just one week. But it begs the question: Freedom for whom? How many lives have been disrupted or lost since her decision to open Europe’s borders in 2017? What on Earth was she thinking in her moment of madness? The consequences of those policies have created a hostile Europe which increasingly feels like a ticking time bomb, especially during the Christian festive seasons.
Millions of European citizens are now questioning the decisions made by Merkel and her cronies in accepting millions of refugees into Europe and at the same time feeding thousands of murderous traffickers with an everlasting flow of illegal Euros. These same traffickers are responsible for hundreds, maybe thousands of refugee deaths, many of them little children, drowned in the cold unforgiving waters of the English Channel. I wonder, were the deaths of these unfortunate kids mentioned in her best-selling book?
Millions of Muslims are now living in Germany and many more millions are living in the rest of Europe. If only 0.5% of the millions of refugees living in Germany are Jihadi sympathisers or soldiers or sleeper cells, as many as 40,000 are laying low and waiting for a chance in Merkel's backyard alone. Thousands more in Europe's historical cities could be waiting for their chance. Roughly 25,000 Muslims are said to be known as a threat in the UK—Think about that, 25,000 potential threats to UK citizens walking the streets of the UK
How could this have happened in a democracy, especially when you consider almost "two-thirds" of Germans think Islam does not "belong" in their country! And who can blame them after the terrorist attacks, murder, child sexual attacks and rape by Muslim men who have been recently allowed into Germany, Sweden, Belgium and other European countries? This attack would not have happened without "uncontrolled immigration." Germans of course are now calling for mass deportations but, you can't put the toothpaste back in the tube.
Meanwhile, Europe can’t rely on the U.S. the way it once did. America’s global influence appears to be waning, compounded by internal chaos and leadership challenges. Rumours abound about President Biden’s capacity to govern effectively during his tenure has now surfaced and—Apparently, the guy has never been fit to be President since he was elected four years ago. Trump was right all along—He was robbed of a second term!
And while Trump’s return in January offers potential for stability, his stance on NATO is far from solid—Favouring withdrawal if other nations don’t pay their fair share. NATO of course was originally designed to protect Europe from Russia, oh the irony!—NATO now risks pulling the continent into yet another global conflict, leaving Europe in a very uncertain position and the Russian Bear all over Europe like a terrible rash. These are turbulent times indeed, and as we navigate them, it’s critical to ask hard questions about leadership, policy, and accountability on both sides of the Atlantic.
Just today, supermarkets across Europe are warning people of imminent disaster. Calling for customers to prepare for major disasters or power outages. Supermarkets and other essential stores are starting to set up emergency plans in case of war, climate disaster or power outage. Early in 2025, ‘emergency scripts’ will be drawn up and what needs to be done to keep stores afloat for as long as possible.
Shifting gears, I learned a new word this week: nefarious. Oddly, it’s being used to describe the drone activity over New Jersey. “Not nefarious,” we’re assured. But why such a loaded term? “Nefarious” literally means evil. Why not use softer words like not a threat, not a hazard, or not a menace? The choice of language seems intentional, stirring suspicion in a public already weary of decades of cover-ups and half-truths from the Pentagon and the government about what’s happening in our skies.
No comments:
Post a Comment