Sunday, 18 October 2026

She Blinded Me With Science—"COOKING THE BOOKS!" "Our very future (the US) depended on being the ones who first seized ownership of space." “Control of space means control of the world,” Vice President Johnson

 

"She blinded me with science!"

I want to draw your attention to a set of official graphs and statistics that, on the surface, mean little until they are put together. As I mentioned earlier, 1957 has become a pivotal year in my research; a phenomenal amount of data suggested a 'cosmic' event happened in that year, on Earth and in Heaven (signs and wonders), and consequently lined up perfectly with the three prophecies of Jesus in His Sermon on the Mount warning His disciples.

The origin of prophecy is from outside of our "known" dimensions of space and time. Prophecy is prediction (thousands of years) before it happens.
 
So, more importantly, it was only in the late 50s that His prophecy suddenly made sense and helped us, as a generation, understand just where we stood in His cosmic space and time of Bible prophecy.

As we know, a record-breaking number of sunspots exploded on our star, and a record number of major earthquakes and volcanic activity were recorded here on Earth. Consequently, the beginning of the space race occurred in 1957, just two months before the explosion of sunspots. Numerous official graphs show our planet began to warm, and pestilence, famine and death gripped our world.

Several wars were being fought around the globe, and of course the Cold War was in full swing. (Wars and rumours of wars) A famine known as the Great Leap Forward was about to take a firm grip in China; the Great Leap Forward would go on to kill almost 50 million people.

All of these events tie in with what Jesus described as "signs and wonders". Deception, something we discussed in the last chapter was another clear warning from Jesus, was clearly on the rise in 1957 too. NASA was about to be launched after the US had lost the space race to the Soviets. Eisenhower warned the world of a mighty military-industrial complex in which AI was already being considered, and CERN was building their ambitious Hadron Collider over here in Europe.

It was around the same time, Vice President Johnson at Southwest Texas State University claimed in a speech: "Our very future (the US) depended on being the ones who first seized ownership of space." “Control of space means control of the world,” Johnson declared.

He continued:

“From space, the masters of infinity would have the power to control the earth’s weather, to cause drought and flood, to change the tides and raise the levels of the sea, to divert the Gulf Stream and change temperate climates to frigid.” (which is exactly what is happening now, 60 years later!)

A prominent scientist at the time, called Harry Wexler, who was on JFK's team of scientists, warned Vice President Johnson and the US government in 1962 that increased pollution from "rocket exhaust" (nuclear testing, space exploration and experimenting with sounding rockets) was doing terrible things to our atmosphere. However, the military intervention made sure the experiments continued. Harry Wexler warned the government that chlorine and bromine were destroying the ozone, which would eventually disrupt the jet stream, which in turn would cause worldwide weather chaos. By the way, Wexler died suddenly in 1962 of a heart attack.     

One of the biggest causes of extreme weather recently is, yes, you guessed—the 'erratic' behaviour of a disrupted jet stream, which is causing horrendous storms, flooding, heatwaves, and bone-crunching cold in countries of the Northern Hemisphere.

To back up this crazy weather trend, the number of recorded natural disasters has also increased considerably since 1957; this is not contested. However, NOAA, NASA, USGS and other scientific databases claim there's an important distinction between the number of disasters being recorded and the number actually occurring. 

I can't imagine 'MORE' disasters being reported than what have actually occurred. I can understand some smaller rural disasters not being reported, but not the other way around. (Even the establishment doesn't report on disasters that don't happen . . . Do they?)

Natural Disasters

To investigate this properly, we need to look at evidence across several categories: earthquakes, volcanic eruptions, floods, droughts, tropical storms, wildfires, and extreme temperatures.

The key question is whether the Earth itself has become more hazardous, whether climate change or other phenomena are increasing certain types of natural disasters and extreme weather, or whether 'better monitoring and reporting' explain some of the increases.

Better monitoring in later years is one example all the top science sites and media claim. They say technology and reporting techniques have become much more reliable over the years, something I totally agreed with until I looked deeper.

The 'better monitoring and reporting' excuse is, in my opinion, often used as a safety net for the research and data people. Remember I pointed out USGS changing a hundred years of major earthquake data 'three times' in a handful of years a couple of chapters back? (hundreds of earthquakes, three times in less than ten years!)

Scientists need funding, of course

ChatGPT tends to go along with the establishment too when questioned about improved data and technology. And here lies the problem: we have come to a point now where it's genuinely difficult to know who to believe, because so many scientists and experts have been caught altering data and results or cooking the books. Truth has suddenly become something of a blur.

What does the scientists' general consensus regarding natural disasters tell us? What is the  'evidence' from the 'experts'?

1. Extreme weather — clear increases in several categories

The IPCC Climate Change Assessment finds that hot extremes and heatwaves have become more frequent and intense across most land regions since the late 1950s. This is exactly what Harry Wexler warned us would happen.

Heavy rainfall has also increased across many well-observed regions. Human-caused climate change (caused by man-made rockets and the space race) is a major driver of these changes. As I write this chapter, a record-busting El Niño is currently disrupting worldwide weather and 2026 is on course to be yet another hottest year on record. According to NASA, the last ten years have been the hottest on record; now, a statistic like that cannot be easily falsified. 

2. Floods and droughts — a mixed picture and, in my humble opinion, a bit of a "cop-out!"

They say, heavy rainfall and flooding risks have increased in many regions, while drought trends vary considerably by region and by how drought is measured. We cannot assume every part of the world is becoming drier or more flood-prone. However, this is a hard one to swallow considering all the satellites in space monitoring anything that moves here on Earth; surely, they should know exactly who's having a drought and who's not?

3. Earthquakes—no equivalent global increase established? Well, I beg to differ

They say no comparable evidence shows that earthquakes worldwide have increased steadily since 1900, according to the official data from USGS. This is simply not true. I have tracked and plotted major quakes around the world from 1900 till now three times in recent years; each time the numbers had been changed, and USGS have openly admitted to changing their data on a regular basis. 

They say modern instruments detect many smaller events that would previously have gone unnoticed, so raw counts can be misleading. In my research, I plotted only major earthquakes, magnitude 6 or higher, hardly small events. (And they changed hundreds of major quakes, three times in several years). 

A tale of three graphs, 2014, 2019 and 2022 . . . Each one immensely different.

Three times since 2013, I have arduously downloaded every major quake (mag 6 or higher) from 1900 to the present and added the data to a graph to enable an easy and perspective viewing for the reader, showing the increase in major quakes since 1900. The first time I did this was in 2013; see above. Incredibly, the above graph is in perfect sync with all the other disaster and temperature graphs in the post below—the same pattern after 1957, just like all the others.

However, in 2019 I had a tip-off from Prophecy Watchers, the American Christian TV organisation, claiming USGS had been changing information in their Earthquake data. So, I had to go through the whole procedure once again and upload every major quake from 1900 to the present (2019) into my computer to update my graph. What I found was astonishing!

As you can see, the graph directly below is nothing like the first one I uploaded above. Almost all the data has been systematically altered by USGS.

However, what the new data gives us is incredible: in 1950, without any indication or warning, major quakes (mag 6 or higher) suddenly and inexplicably exploded and more than quadrupled from 29 in the year 1947 to an incredible 138. By 1957, the very year we are investigating, that number had increased to a record-breaking 204 major quakes (mag 6 or higher) in one year.  An unprecedented number, which has only ever been beaten in 2011, the year of the Fukushima quake!

1957 not only recorded a record number of sunspots on our Sun but also a record number of major quakes here on Earth


When I checked back into USGS in 2022 for a third time. I was no longer surprised. Yes, data had indeed been added and removed again for the third time in 9 years. The graph above, showing the record number of major quakes in 1957, had been altered once again; see below. . .


The new graph, Dec 28 2022, above shows more than 120 years of major quakes; however, look below and see the alterations in data (earthquake numbers, added or taken away) since the same graph I made in 2019. For instance, the year 1957 is now showing just 175 major quakes—29 have been deleted from 1957 alone! 1905 is showing a massive total of 51 major quakes instead of just 3! If my maths is correct, more than 1,000 major quakes, mag 6 or higher, have been added which were not there when I uploaded my first graph in 2013!

Below I have added an Email address for anyone wishing to contact USGS with a question.

4. Wildfires and extreme heat — serious concerns

They say heat extremes are increasing, and climate change can make conditions favourable for severe fires in many regions. However, fire activity also depends on vegetation, land management, ignition sources and local weather. (But when an entire coastline of a continent is on fire, as was Eastern Australia in 2019, killing billions of wildlife, crops and vegetation, wildfires and extreme heat are a tad harder to deny!)

Conclusion

1. Extreme weather — clear increases in several categories

2. Floods and droughts — a mixed picture and, in my humble opinion, a "cop-out!"

3. Earthquakes—no equivalent global increase established? Well, I beg to differ

4. Wildfires and extreme heat — serious concerns

What does their data show? ( Check the graph titel your reading, they all look remarkably similar!)

Below is a graph from GRID-Arendal showing multiple disaster causes since 1900. GRID-Arendal is a non-profit environmental organisation, established in 1989 under a strong mandate from UNEP and the Norwegian governance system. The graph shows a definite rise in the number of global disasters since 1957.

But here's something particularly important about 1957. The international disaster database, EM-DAT, below, shows a dramatic rise in recorded disasters from the 1960s through to around 2000, but then again, so do all the graphs below, from different organisations. If we are to believe the suits and scientists who claim that technology and reporting techniques have become much more reliable over the years, why then does each graph show the same increase happening in the late 50s and early 60s? Did new tech suddenly improve all reporting after 1957? Don't take my word for it; have a look yourself all the graphs look the same!  

Below is the same graph from Our World in Data as the one above. However, researchers at Our World in Data warn that much of the disaster increase reflects improvements in reporting, communications, satellite monitoring and the development of disaster databases. They say the records before 2000 are less complete and cannot reliably establish the true global increase in disaster frequency. But do these graphs say the records after 1957 'are'  more complete and can be taken more seriously?
It's only when you realise all these graphs look the same that you realise, "hey, they can't all have improved technology and reporting techniques at the precise same time?"

Below, once again—NASA are the first to tell us:
"Without the Sun’s energy, life as we know it could not exist on our home planet."

However, too much energy and we have an inverted scenario . . . 


Below sea surface temps since 1957. It's just the same, of course. . .

According to NASA, 90% of global warming is occurring in our oceans!

There has been an increase in ocean heat content during recent decades as the oceans absorb over 90% of the heat from global warming. Above is a chart by RCraig09 showing ocean heat content in the top 200m and top 700m since 1957. Can you imagine the carnage from storms, hurricanes, and typhoons if sea temperatures keep rising for just another 5 years? The continued rise would also be lethal for a large percentage of marine life. . . More on that subject later.

The graph above from IPCC attempts to show global warming since 1850 with the expected steady rise after 1957. The observed temperatures agree with the NASA graph below; however, IPCC and NASA somehow disagree with each other about a very large dip with natural drivers: solar and volcanic activity? NASA'S graph shows a definitive decline in solar irradiance after 1957, while the IPCC graph shows a flat line for solar activity after 1957.
 

NASA's explanation:
The above graph compares global surface temperature changes (red line) and the Sun's energy received by Earth (yellow line) in watts (units of energy) per square meter since 1880. Below, I have the same data taken from two specialised graphs from NASA and NOAA showing the exact individual data. Are NASA telling us the whole story? Remember, since its formation in 1958, they have been calling UFO enthusiasts "conspiracy theorists!" Now we are told UFOs are real.


For more information about earthquake updates and why earthquakes are added or deleted from the earthquake maps, or if you have further questions, you can contact the Earthquake Hazards Team at: eq_questions@usgs.gov 

 To Be Continued . . .