Thursday, 26 January 2023

Who's Checking The Fact Checkers? The BBC is an organisation that along with other media establishments dropped their immense commercial heavyweight clout and championed the vaccine mandate: These organisations are now being fact-checked themselves and beginning to look a tad sinister!

Batya Ungar-Sargon and Robby Soave react to the questioning of Pfizer CEO Albert Bourla at the World Economic Forum regarding vaccine effectiveness. #Pfizer #Covid last week.

I stumbled on a BBC post yesterday and had me good ole' chuckle. No, Damar Hamlin was not replaced by a body double is the name of the post and is written by the self-claimed 'US disinformation reporter, Mike Wendling.' 

Apparently, activists who blamed NFL star Damar Hamlin's on-field collapse this month on Covid-19 vaccines have concocted another baseless conspiracy theory - that the player has been replaced by a "body double" or even a "clone".

Well, I wouldn't know about that, but Mike Wielding does, and he goes on—Among those spreading the rumours was Stew Peters, one of the people behind a documentary called Died Suddenly, an online hit in anti-vaccination circles that includes a number of dubious and false claims. More here 

The BBC is an organisation that along with other media establishments pushed its immense commercial heavyweight clout behind the vaccine mandate since the beginning of its release in mid-2020 and onwards. The BBC is known to pride itself on being the 'FACT-CHECKERS,' on everything, but, especially, on the safety, and health benefits of the Covid-19 vaccine program, which in the last few months have come into doubt, even by the vaccine makers themselves.

While the BBC and other media and so-called health organisations carry on their hype about Covid vaccines and there wonderful potential to make the world a healthier place again, the slow drip-feed of lies is beginning to highlight the BBC as the conspiracy theorists and the conspiracy theorists as the 'fact-checkers.' 

Left is the opening page of the "Clinical Trial Protocol of Pfizer's Covid-19 vaccination tests—PDF File. The title clearly states the trial protocol was to evaluate the safety, tolerability, immunogenicity, and efficacy of the SARS-COV-2 RNA vaccine against Covid-19 in healthy individuals.

Almost 60% of the 13 billion Covid-19 vaccines administered to people around the world since 2020 were injected with the Pfizer vaccine. I think that is somewhere in the region of 9 billion.

As early as December 2020, these Western governments or friends of the West were using the Pfizer injection to vaccinate their citizens—Australia,  Canada,  France,  Germany,  Hungary, Indonesia, Israel,  Japan,  New Zealand, Saudi Arabia,  South Korea, United Kingdom and of course the United States of America.

This was an incredible feat when you consider Pfizer began clinical trials on their vaccination just 3 days after China officials released part of the Covid DNA segment on January 11 2020? Some experts say almost impossible.

On October 10, four days before The European Public Prosecutor’s Office (EPPO) announced that it has an ongoing investigation into the acquisition of COVID-19 vaccines in the European Union. The European Parliament asked Pfizer CEO Albert Bourla to answer questions in front of a special COVID committee of the European Parliament. Instead, he refused. He sent Janine Small, president of Pfizer's International Developed Markets, to take his place in the hearing, however, she was unable, incapable or unwilling to answer almost all of the questions. She failed to deliver any relevant information, except for one stunning statement.

In October 2022, Janine Small, president of Pfizer's International Developed Markets was asked how Pfizer began clinical trials on their vaccination just 3 days after China officials released part of the Covid DNA segment on January 11 2020?
"How was this possible," asked MEP Christian Terhes. She refused to answer his question. Mr Tehres, however, asked the same question to the CEO of Moderna, Stephane Bancel, he claimed work on Moderna's vaccine had started in '2017' more than '2 years before Covid-19 had apparently been discovered.'
Janine Small was also asked by the committee if Pfizer had tested whether their injections "stopped transmission" of the Covid-19 virus, to which she dropped the "BOMB"— "NO. . . They did not." Press conference here.

Also in October 2022, Janine Small was asked by Dutch MEP, Rob Roos:
"Was the Pfizer COVID vaccine tested on stopping the transmission of the virus before it entered the market?" "If not, please say it clearly." Small answered: “Regarding the question, did we know about stopping immunization before it entered the market? No.” "We did not."
She continued:
“We had to move at the "speed of science" to understand what is taking place in the market. And from that point of view, we had to do everything at risk.”

We had to move at the speed of science? Janine Small's answer.

Rob Roos asked AstraZeneca and Moderna the same question, however, they both refused to answer his question.

Janine Small was asked the price of a vaccine, but she refused to answer. She was also asked, just what Pfizer have to hide in their vaccine contract with the Euro Commission. She refused to answer. She was asked about a"redacted" version of the Pfizer/Euro Commission vaccine contracts, (more than 100 pages which were almost entirely blacked out) she said that Pfizer couldn't disclose the entire contract because they had certain "interests" to protect. This was, by the way, the biggest contract ever awarded by the European Commission, costing the taxpayer, E 36 billion, wasted money. 

The European Parliament are also investigating an SMS between Albert Bourla, the Pfizer CEO and Ursula von der Leyen, President of the European Commission which is considered to be irregular according to EU transparency regulation, the EU ombudsman and the EU Court of Auditors. As far as I know, the SMS text has never been released to the public!

But, a press release on Pfizer's website here on April 01 2021, proudly announced:
Pfizer and BioNTech 'Confirm High Efficacy' and "No Serious Safety Concerns Through Up to Six Months Following Second Dose in Updated Topline Analysis of Landmark COVID-19 Vaccine Study. . ."
Analysis of 927 confirmed symptomatic cases of COVID-19 demonstrates BNT162b2 is highly effective with "91.3% vaccine efficacy observed against COVID-19," measured seven days through up to six months after the second dose. . .
 
The vaccine was 100% effective in preventing severe disease as defined by the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and 95.3% effective in preventing severe illness as defined by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration. . .

The vaccine was 100% effective in preventing COVID-19 cases in South Africa, where the B.1.351 lineage is prevalent. . .

Where did the above figures come from? The Phizer boss Janine Small admitted to the European Commission Pfizer had not tested whether their injections "stopped transmission" of the Covid-19 virus. "NO, she said. . . They did not."

Ok. For almost three years, The Big Wobble, along with many hundreds of other so-called "conspiracy sites," have stood together, demanding, screaming even, for transparency over Covid-19, how it arrived, the very dodgy vaccinations, the vaccination mandate, cover-ups and government-controlled mainstream media lies. Yes, they do lie.

When did the virus start? We have never found out, where it came from, and what or who was responsible. However, it has been established Big Pharmer was testing vaccinations for the virus years before it was released. The Americans are blaming China, and China is blaming America and that's exactly what Anthony Fauci was told by the National Institute of Health, (NIH) back around 2012/13. 

As news broke of a new Sars-type virus breaking out in the Chinese city of Wuhan in late 2019, a new threat to our way of life was quickly established, eventually leading the entire planet into lockdown. However, almost immediately, before the virus had even reached the West, the White House was asking scientists whether the new Coronavirus outbreak, was actually, bioengineered. The question being asked was, is this Covid-19, as it was later christened, a weapon leashed onto the unsuspecting world. Almost immediately, claims and counter-claims began. America was blaming China and China blamed the US, for leaking this new menace.

It turns out though, the unsuspecting world may have been taken by surprise but governments and the military had known about the virus months before it reached the news headlines. The US government reportedly gave Israel an advanced warning over the emerging threat the coronavirus posed in China around mid-November 2019, more than a month and a half before the official warning came from China.  According to Israeli broadcaster Channel 12, US intelligence agencies became aware of the danger posed by COVID-19, and the information was then handed over to the White House, “which did not deem it of interest”.

Despite the Trump administration's dismissal of the information, US intelligence decided to warn its close allies of the contagious disease, specifically NATO (30 member states) Nothing was done.

According to a new report by the United States Senate, PDF File, they claim Covid-19 probably started in mid-October 2019 in Wuhan China. However, retired nurse educator and Covid-19 commentator, Dr John Cambell believes the virus was probably in Northern America, Australia and Europe as early as June 2019. Dr Cambell claims over the last two and a half years he has received thousands of emails and comments from westerners who say they were ill, with Covid-type symptoms as early as December 2019. Officially, Covid-19 had not yet spread from the Wuhan area at this time. Many others claim they had Covid-19 symptoms as early as the summer of 2019, but officially it had not yet been discovered.

In early January, authorities in the Chinese city of Wuhan were trying to keep news of a new coronavirus under wraps. However, Dr Li tried, who later died from Covid warned fellow medics about the outbreak on an internet forum. The police paid him a visit and told him to stop. It's a stunning insight into the botched response by local authorities in Wuhan in the early weeks of the coronavirus outbreak. Dr Li was working at the centre of the outbreak in December when he noticed seven cases of a virus that he thought looked like Sars - the virus that led to a global epidemic in 2003.

On 30 December he sent a message to fellow doctors in a chat group warning them about the outbreak and advising them to wear protective clothing to avoid infection. What Dr Li didn't know then was that the disease that had been discovered was an entirely new coronavirus. Four days later he had a visit from officials from the Public Security Bureau who told him to sign a letter. In the letter, he was accused of "making false comments" that had "severely disturbed the social order". He was one of eight people who police said were being investigated for "spreading rumours". On 10 January he started coughing, the next day he had a fever and two days later he was in the hospital. His parents also fell ill and were taken to the hospital. It was 10 days later - on 20 January - that China declared the outbreak an emergency. BBC 

Where did it start?

The new report from the United States Senate, PDF File, is quite confident, after their extensive study, Covid-19 started, or was leaked from China's National Biosafety Lab and not the animal market in Wuhan. Without going into fine details, the report appears to be built of fine logic and can be read in full by clicking on the link above.

But of course, blaming China's National Biosafety Lab does not clear any fog on where the virus originates from, or how it came to be stored in the lab in the first place. 

Dr Anthony S. Fauci 

In 1999 patents on a coronavirus started showing up. In March 2003 panic gripped Hong Kong with the Sars outbreak and the CDC realised they had found a virus which could be easily manipulated into something very valuable and in the very same year decided to patent it. 

According to Dr David Martin—Anthony Fauci, left Director of the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Disease (NIAID) and Chief Medical Advisor to the President and Ralph Baric, the distinguished Professor at the UNC-Chapel Hill University along with other distinguished people at the CDC were at the hub of this story from 2003 to 2006. They controlled 100% of the cash flow which built the empire around the mighty industrial complex of the coronavirus.

Dr David Martin is the CEO and inventor of Linguistic Genomics. In the early 2,000s', his company was responsible for bringing down the largest tax frauds in the history of the US. His company maintained a series of inquiries into every individual, organisation and company that was involved in anything that blurred the line between biological and chemical weapons or crossed that line in more than 165 countries.


In 1999 there were a million patents digitalised by IBM and these million patents were the first time human innovation had been put into an electronic digital searchable format. Dr David Martin took that information and devised a very simple exercise using his own Linguistic Genomics technology. He stumbled on the horrific assessment that approximately one-third of all patents filed in the United States were “functional forgeries,” meaning while they had linguistic variations they actually covered the same subject matter. In 1999 patents on a coronavirus started showing up and thus began Dr Martin’s rabbit trail.


In March 2003 panic gripped Hong Kong.

A deadly virus swept through the city and according to Dr Martin the CDC saw the possibility of a gold strike and that was the Sars, Coronavirus outbreak which had manifested itself in Asia. The CDC realised they had found a virus which could be easily manipulated into something very valuable and in the very same year decided to patent it. They made sure they controlled the preparatory rights to the virus and to its detection and all measurements of it. Dr Martin goes on to claim Anthony Fauci, Director of the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Disease (NIAID) and Chief Medical Advisor to the President and Ralph Baric, Distinguished Professor at the UNC-Chapel Hill University along with other distinguished people at the CDC were at the hub of this story from 2003 to 2006. They controlled 100% of the cash flow which built the empire around the mighty industrial complex of the coronavirus.


Dr Martin claims the coronavirus manipulation started with Ralph Baric, PHD, back in 1999, Baric is now the chief researcher at North Carolina Chapel Hill University and is world-famous for his chimeric coronavirus research. In 2002 the virus was seen as an exploitable mechanism for both good and ill.


On April 25th 2003, the US CDC filed the patent, number US7776521B1 on the “coronavirus transmitted to humans.” Under 35 U.S.C. law, nature is prohibited from being patented. Either the Sars, Coronavirus is manufactured, or it is nature, therefore making a patent on it illegal on both counts. If it was "manufactured," it is a violation of the biological and chemical weapons treaty and if it is "nature," filing a patent on something of nature is illegal, so either outcome is illegal.


In the Spring of 2007, the CDC filed a petition with the patent office to keep their application confidential and private. They actually not only filed patents on the virus but also filed patents on its detection and a kit to measure it. Because of that CDC patent,, the CDC had gained the ability to control who was authorised and who was not to make independent inquiries into the Coronavirus. You can not look at the virus, not measure it and can’t develop a kit for it by ultimately receiving the patents that constrained anyone from using it, they had the means, they had the motive and most of all they had the monetary gain from turning the Coronavirus from a pathogen to a profit.


According to Dr Martin, somewhere between 2012 and 2013 something happened, the federal funding for research into the virus which was feeding into places such as Harvard, Emery and UNC-Chapel Hill suddenly became impaired by something that happened at the National Institute of Health, (NIH). The NIH got this “little moment of clarity,” and said, “We think something you are doing is wrong.” In 2013, the NIH said research on the Coronavirus should be suspended. The NIH had a moral, social and potentially legal reason to object to Coronavirus research but the letter which was sent to the researchers essentially said you’re receiving notice that we are telling you to “STOP, ” and now on the bottom of the page we are going to qualify what stop means, which is “KEEP GOING” but when the heat gets hot in 2014-15, offshore the research, you fund the Wuhan Institute of Virology to do the stuff which is getting a little edgy with respect to its morality and illegality.


Run the money through a string of cover organisations to make it look like you are funding a US operation which subcontracts to the Wuhan Institute of Virology, then if the “SHTF” the US can say the Chinese did it and the Chinese can say the US did it and the fact is both of them are almost telling the truth.


This is of course exactly what did happen and of course, since then the Americans have blamed China and China has blamed the Americans.


In 2017, US biosafety experts warned that the "virus" could 'escape' the facility in WUHAN. It could be the scenario of a Hollywood Blockbuster but, could the mysterious Coronavirus which exploded in China and other parts of the world in just the first 25 days of 2020 have accidentally leaked from China's only lab, designated for studying dangerous pathogens like SARS and Ebola? It has happened before, in 2004, a SARS virus 'leaked' from a lab in Beijing. It seems highly coincidental that The Wuhan National Biosafety Laboratory is the only lab in China designated for studying dangerous pathogens and is the city where the mysterious coronavirus began!


On December the 24th 2019, laboratory bosses accepted an annual management review with the object to ensure the implementation of the management principles and quality objectives of the laboratory safety system and maintaining the suitability, adequacy and effectiveness of the system. A week later on the day the US Embassy was attacked in Iraq, The World Health Organization (WHO) was alerted by Chinese authorities, of a string of pneumonia-like cases in Wuhan, a city of 11 million people. Patients were quarantined and work began on identifying the origin of pneumonia. The US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) identified a seafood market in Wuhan that was suspected to be at the centre of the outbreak. The market was closed on Jan 1, 2020.


Is Covid-19 a biological weapon? Dr Fauci's name turns up in Ukraine!


Back in March 2022 a few days after President Biden told the world he would take out the Nord Stream 2 Pipeline, Israel 365 issued a press release claiming the Pentagon had admitted running bio-weapon labs in Ukraine and were now, very worried they would fall into the hands of the Russians.

"Does Ukraine have chemical or biological weapons," US Senator for Florida Marco Rubia asked. In response, the US Under Secretary of State for Political Affairs Victoria Nuland said, "Ukraine has biological research facilities, which, in fact, we are quite concerned Russian troops, Russian forces, may be seeking to gain control of, so we are working with the Ukrainians on how they can prevent any of those research materials from falling into the hands of Russian forces should they approach. Video here

The theory that US-run bio labs in Ukraine were developing COVID-related diseases as part of a plan by "Dr Anthony Fauci," to release a new pandemic on the world was debunked by the mainstream media as “QAnon, conspiracy theories” and “Russian disinformation.” But testimony by a US government official in front of Congress revealed that at least part of this “conspiracy theory” is, in fact, true. The prestigious Foreign Policy site described it as a “discredited QAnon conspiracy theory.” The article called for the claim of US bio labs in Ukraine to be removed from the internet by “regulated social media networks” because it appeared on “unregulated platforms such as Telegram and 8Chan.” Full story

According to China, the US has 336 labs in 30 countries under its control, including 26 in Ukraine alone. It should give a full account of its biological military activities at home and abroad and subject itself to multilateral verification. They claim that U.S. bio-military activities in Ukraine are only “the tip of the iceberg,”. “Under various names, the U.S. Department of Defense controls 336 biological laboratories in 30 countries.” (there are 30 NATO member states?)  At the same time, Xinhua News Agency, the official state press agency of the People’s Republic of China, reported in March 2022, that it had been “confirmed,” that pathogens from deadly diseases stored in US-funded laboratories in Ukraine had been destroyed. However, that would still leave 210 biological laboratories dangerously placed around the world.

It is so very obvious we have been fed disinformation from the western media and our own governments, (the very people we elected) regarding the Covid pandemic, the consequent lockdown and the vaccine mandate. Lies, 'alternative truths and double-speak,' regarding China and Russia, especially after the invasion of Ukraine have also brainwashed us into believing Ukraine and the West are the innocent parties here.

Did China or the US release Covid-19?

In 2017, US biosafety experts warned that the "virus" could 'escape' the facility in WUHAN. It could be the scenario of a Hollywood Blockbuster but, could the mysterious Coronavirus which exploded in China and other parts of the world in just the first 25 days of 2020 have accidentally leaked from China's only lab in China, designated for studying dangerous pathogens like SARS and Ebola? It has happened before, in 2004, a SARS virus 'leaked' from a lab in Beijing. It seems highly coincidental that The Wuhan National Biosafety Laboratory is the only lab in China designated for studying dangerous pathogens and is the city where the mysterious coronavirus began! Remember, the European Commission cross-examined the CEO of Moderna, who claimed work on their vaccine for Covid had started in 2017, what a coincidence! Remember, Moderna, Inc., is an American pharmaceutical and biotechnology company based in Cambridge, Massachusetts that focuses on RNA therapeutics, primarily mRNA vaccines. Coincidently, Moderna's only commercial product is the Moderna COVID-19 vaccine, marketed as Spikevax. Moderna was probably set up purely to produce Covid-19 vaccines! You can't make this up folks!

According to Dr Martin, in 2013, the National Institutes of Health (NIH) said research on the "Coronavirus" should be suspended. The NIH had a moral, social and potentially legal reason to object to Coronavirus research but the letter which was sent to the researchers essentially said you’re receiving notice that we are telling you to “STOP, ” and now on the bottom of the page we are going to qualify what stop means, which is “KEEP GOING”—but when the heat gets hot in 2014-15, offshore the research, you fund the "Wuhan Institute of Virology" to do the stuff which is getting a little edgy with respect to its morality and illegality. Then if the “SHTF” the US can say the Chinese did it and the Chinese can say the US did it and the fact is both of them are almost telling the truth.


This is of course exactly what did happen and of course, since then the Americans have blamed China and China has blamed the Americans.

In March 2020,  CNN reported, A prominent Chinese official has promoted a conspiracy theory that the United States military could have brought the novel coronavirus to China -- and it did not originate in the city of Wuhan, as thought. Posting to his more than 300,000 followers on Twitter, Foreign Ministry spokesman Zhao Lijian republished a video of Robert Redfield, the director of the US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, addressing a US Congressional committee on March 11. In the clip, Redfield said some influenza deaths in the US were later identified as cases of Covid-19, the disease caused by the novel coronavirus. "CDC was caught on the spot." When did patient zero begin in the US? How many people are infected? What are the names of the hospitals? It might be the US army who brought the epidemic to Wuhan. Be transparent! Make public your data! The US owes us an explanation!" the Foreign Ministry official said. Hundreds of athletes from the US military were in Wuhan for the Military World Games in October 2019.

Now ladies and gentlemen, let's cast our minds back to June 27 2021. A very angry Joe Biden announced to the world—"There is a pandemic of unvaccinated people in the US!" He was, of course, not the only government leader at this time using unvaccinated people as a tool for propaganda to"coerce" innocent people into receiving a vaccine which now appears to have never even been tested!

French President Macron said he wanted to "piss off" the none vaccinated.

Anti-vaxxers like me were called a misinformed movement and were on borrowed time.

Writing in the Daily Mail, the hugely self-opinionated Pierce Morgan claimed anti-vaxxers were deluded, ill-informed, shameful, scaremongers, simply complacent believing vaccines are more dangerous than covid itself!

He also called people who refused the Covid-19 vaccines "ignorant morons."

Bloomberg claimed that anti-vaxxers and anti-maskers are "deadly" and not principled people.

Forbes ran the headline, "what are we going to do with the anti-vaxxers!"

As autumn 2021 slowly morphed into winter, a large "useless society" was emerging, an army of pariahs, outcasts, parasites, and people who became despised and rejected. This group would become discriminated against, bullied, and coerced into receiving the Covid vaccine, something we were told would not happen when the first vaccines rolled off the shelf late last year.

Tens of thousands of workers around the world were being given an ultimatum, to become vaccinated or lose their jobs. Many of these people who were now threatened with the sack had been championed as heroes just a few months earlier! Care workers, nurses, doctors and ambulance drivers. These same people were now classed as social pariahs.

Joe Biden claimed, once again: "The 'bigger story isn't that thousands of people are losing their jobs, but that the "new mandates" are increasing the percentage of Americans in the workforce who are vaccinated against COVID-19." "The new rule, would 'cover 100 million Americans, about two-thirds of all the people working in America." Biden was proud to claim.

He went on: "Let's be clear when you see headlines and reports of mass firings and hundreds of people losing their jobs, look at the bigger story,' the president added," claiming that the 'bigger story is that more employees in the workforce are vaccinated. Daily Mail

The irony is, back in December 2020 Biden famously stated he didn't think vaccinations would be mandatory and then again in July 2021, he declared America's independence from Covid-19, that claim came back to bite Joe as a rise of 300% new infections per day crippled health care workers despite 210 million Americans having at least one vaccination at the time.

Just how many hundreds of thousands of people lost their jobs for refusing the Covid-vaccination we will never know, I do know 40,000 care workers lost their jobs in the UK alone. I know now because the government is finally looking into the failings of big Pharma with one MP, Danny Kruger actually apologising and calling for reinstations and compensations to the care workers who were fired. Just how close did the world come to compulsory vaccinations during the pandemic? 

There is now disturbing evidence of a significant increase in heart attacks and related health issues since the rollout of the Covid-19 vaccines and, as Covid-19 drops off and becomes less of a threat—Heart attacks and related health issues are rising around the world and, data suggests, countries with higher numbers of vaccinations are showing a higher number of what they are now calling excess mortality death. Our wonderful Main Stream Media and Big Pharma should be all over this like a rash, just as they promoted the vaccines in the first place, however, their silence on the subject is deafening!

.........................xx

 


3 comments:

  1. "While the BBC and other so-called health organizations carry out their hype about the covid vaccines and their wonderful potential to make the world a healthier place again..." , people are dropping dead on Camara and off Camara after getting the vaccine, ... and the media and health org.'s/dept.'s continue to look away, ignore and or deny any connection to the covid vaccines and so many all of a sudden "suddenly dying" people!
    It's exactly the same with geoengineering ... the lines in the sky for over a decade long are completely ignored and denied just like these sudden collapsing people dropping dead after receiving the vaccine. Did you notice that pattern?
    What planes spraying in the sky? What lines in the sky? But if there is news of sky spraying activity that just can not be ignored, they answer just like Gary wrote here ... it's to make the world a healthier place, by controlling earth's weather we can heal global warming/climate change. It's only salt being sprayed/its a "safe" amount! Or, we are only putting 2 weather balloons with Sulphur in them up in the atmosphere to see what happens ... do weather ballooons spray long thick white lines all over the skies? Its insulting to me to hear an answer like that. They are soooo past weather balloons! No worries citizens! Lol....


    It is so blatantly bull sh#t that it can only be extreme insanity at this point! The liars are so far gone mentally now that even with clear visuals right in our faces still they have the balls to say what lines, what guy dropped dead? I don't know about you guys but I'm getting a bit out of patience with this script of lies and insanity!!


    ReplyDelete
  2. "Quis custodiet ipsos custodes"

    Isn't that a really old quotation?

    ReplyDelete
  3. Indeed, "Quis custodiet ipsos custodes" derives from Latin, however, "fact-checkers" is what the BBC likes to call themselves as well as other media-related organisations recently.

    ReplyDelete