Photo credit WMH
Millions of tons of toxic particulates thrown into the atmosphere during the last 60 years
Every time a space shuttle was launched, the solid rocket boosters released 240 tons of HCl gas, 26 tons of chlorine gas, 7 tons of nitrogen dioxide gas, and 304 tons of aluminium oxide into the atmosphere. The resulting hydrochloric acid dissolved eight inches of concrete on the launch pad during a Space Shuttle launch, raising the concentration of hydrochloric acid in nearby lakes to 3 M, producing massive fish kills in the ocean, and destroying the paint on cars. Leading chemists to believe that HCl is a major contributor to the holes in the ozone layer. SCRIBD
The Space Shuttle made 135 space flights during its 30-year career, which is more than 41,000 tons of aluminian oxide 3, 510 tons of chlorine gas, 945 tons of nitrogen dioxide gas and 32,400 tons of HCI gas thrown into our atmosphere and that is just the Space Shuttle, throw in Gemini, Apollo and Saturn missions etc, the Russian Space exploration, India and China, the thousands of satellites launched into space, thousands of sounding rockets, (NASA's airborne researchers) add to this more than 2,000 nuclear weapons tests and you begin to imagine the damage mankind has done to our atmosphere, the ionosphere and the ozone layer
The firing of rockets into space coincided with an event on our Sun which left the science community at the time very worried. The USSR launched Sputnik 1, the first artificial satellite in space in October 1957, followed by Explorer 1, the first satellite launched by the United States. A month earlier, something happened on the 24th and 25th of December 1957 which defies logic, defies physics, our sun went ballistic. The story begins with a report from SAO/NASA data system (ADS). Thomas Cragg wrote:
- Millions of tons of toxic particulates thrown into the atmosphere during the last 60 years
- The number of sunspots witnessed on the Sun during Christmas Eve and Christmas Day 1957 (503), alarmed scientists
- Rockets punch a hole in the ionosphere dumping massive amounts of particulates into our atmosphere
- Harry Wexler warned in 1962 that rockets are burning holes in the ionosphere, destroying the ozone layer, and modifying weather on a global scale
- He warned chlorine and bromine were destroying the ozone eventually disrupting the jet stream which in turn would cause world-wide weather chaos such as we are witnessing today.
- Global temperatures begin to rise in the early 60s
Millions of tons of toxic particulates thrown into the atmosphere during the last 60 years
Every time a space shuttle was launched, the solid rocket boosters released 240 tons of HCl gas, 26 tons of chlorine gas, 7 tons of nitrogen dioxide gas, and 304 tons of aluminium oxide into the atmosphere. The resulting hydrochloric acid dissolved eight inches of concrete on the launch pad during a Space Shuttle launch, raising the concentration of hydrochloric acid in nearby lakes to 3 M, producing massive fish kills in the ocean, and destroying the paint on cars. Leading chemists to believe that HCl is a major contributor to the holes in the ozone layer. SCRIBD
The Space Shuttle made 135 space flights during its 30-year career, which is more than 41,000 tons of aluminian oxide 3, 510 tons of chlorine gas, 945 tons of nitrogen dioxide gas and 32,400 tons of HCI gas thrown into our atmosphere and that is just the Space Shuttle, throw in Gemini, Apollo and Saturn missions etc, the Russian Space exploration, India and China, the thousands of satellites launched into space, thousands of sounding rockets, (NASA's airborne researchers) add to this more than 2,000 nuclear weapons tests and you begin to imagine the damage mankind has done to our atmosphere, the ionosphere and the ozone layer
The firing of rockets into space coincided with an event on our Sun which left the science community at the time very worried. The USSR launched Sputnik 1, the first artificial satellite in space in October 1957, followed by Explorer 1, the first satellite launched by the United States. A month earlier, something happened on the 24th and 25th of December 1957 which defies logic, defies physics, our sun went ballistic. The story begins with a report from SAO/NASA data system (ADS). Thomas Cragg wrote:
During 1957, observations of the Sun were made at Mount Wilson Observatory in Washington on 310 days of that year. Not since 1941 have solar observations been possible on as few days in one year as in 1957.
The total number of sunspot groups observed at Mount Wilson in 1957 was 855, the largest number ever observed in one year. The previous record was 633 in 1947.
SAO/NASA data system (ADS) claimed, "without question, we are witnessing the greatest sunspot activity ever recorded." SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System (ADS)The period described above was solar cycle 19, the nineteenth solar cycle since 1755 when extensive recording of solar sunspot activity began. Solar cycle 19 lasted 10.5 years, beginning in April 1954 and ending in October 1964. The number of sunspots witnessed on the Sun during Christmas Eve and Christmas Day 1957 (503), alarmed scientists so much at the time, that an International Geophysical Year was declared at the peak of this solar cycle to bring the Russian and US scientists onto the same page after the cold-war silence. Curiously, President Eisenhower went on to authorise the opening of the National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA) in July 1958. The Space Race Began. Two days after the United States announced its intention to launch an artificial satellite, on July 31, 1956, the Soviet Union announced its intention to do the same. Sputnik 1 was launched on October 4, 1957, beating the United States and stunning people all over the world. In 1958, NASA first observed that changes in the solar orbit of the earth, along with alterations to the earth’s axial tilt, suggesting solar activity was responsible fluctuations in our planet's weather. In the year 2000, NASA did publish information on its Earth Observatory website about the Milankovitch Climate Theory, revealing that the planet is, in fact, changing due to extraneous factors that have absolutely nothing to do with human activity. But this information has yet to go mainstream, see the report on Earth Observatory Coincidently, Milankovitch died in 1958. The maximum sunspot number observed during the solar cycle was 503, on Christmas Eve and Day 1957 (the highest on record). Intense red aurora displays frightened people in Europe on 11 February 1958 and were visible from many US cities as far south as the 40th parallel. This geomagnetic storm caused a radio blackout over North America. Aurora displays were visible over New York on 13 November 1960 and 1 October 1961.
We are launching rockets into space all day and every day around the world. Every time these rockets are launched they punch a hole in our ionosphere dumping massive amounts of particulates into our atmosphere. The problem here lies not with airlines who, indeed, do spray toxic substances (aluminium and barium) into our skies, however, the amount is minuscule when compared to the incredible amounts dumped into the atmosphere by space agencies and the satellite service.
In the early 60s, JFK, and Lindon Johnson realised they had to find a way to control the sun's power affecting the weather here on Earth, Johnson apparently had more sinister ideas and wanted to use the weather as a weapon. A prominent scientist at the time, Harry Wexler who was on JFK's team warned the US government in 1962 that increased pollution from rocket exhaust was doing terrible things to the atmosphere, however, the military intervention made sure the experiments continued, attacking the ozone layer over your enemies nation was appealing to the military.
Harry Wexler warned the government that chlorine and bromine were destroying the ozone eventually disrupting the jet stream which in turn would cause world-wide weather chaos such as we are witnessing today. Wexler died suddenly in 1962 before he could release his findings to the public. Magnetosphere modifications began almost immediately. (Spaceweather modification) They have been shooting up the atmosphere ever since
The ionosphere, Van Allen belts, and upper atmospheric winds are invisible. Solution: Dump chemicals in space and suddenly the invisible can be studied: visibly with telescopes, optically with lasers, and electromagnetically heated with high-powered microwaves (ionospheric heaters) to modify space weather. Aluminium (TMA), Barium, Strontium, Sulfur Hexafluoride (SF6), and Lithium have been dumped in space to study and modify space weather for over sixty years and nobody knew. Harry Wexler warned in 1962 that rockets are burning holes in the ionosphere, destroying the ozone layer, and modifying weather on a global scale. The year following his death W. W. Kellogg from the RAND Corporation suggested expanding the use of sounding rockets to do just that: modify global weather. Wexler’s prescient work between 1958 and 1962 “On the Possibilities of Climate Control” reminds us that we are not the first generation to be involved with or concerned about geoengineering.
Wexler's warning.
“The subject of weather and climate control is now becoming respectable to talk about.” So began Harry Wexler in his speech “On the Possibilities of Climate Control,” given in early 1962 to technical audiences in Boston, Hartford, and Los Angeles. Wexler, who studied meteorology at MIT and served as Chief of Scientific Services at the US Weather Bureau, supported his claim by citing, among others, President John F. Kennedy’s recent speech at the United Nations proposing, “cooperative efforts between all nations in weather prediction and eventually in weather control” and the State Department’s urging of “early and comprehensive study in the light of developments in outer space of the possibility of large-scale weather modification.”
Wexler assured his audiences that he was concerned not with the long and the checkered history of cloud modification leading to more-or-less localized precipitation influences, but with planetary-scale manipulation of the Earth’s shortwave and longwave radiation budget that would result in “rather large-scale effects on the general circulation patterns in short or longer periods, even approaching that of climatic change.”
These effects, details later, included increasing world temperature by several degrees by 2 detonating up to ten H-bombs in the Arctic Ocean; decreasing world temperature by launching powder into an equatorial orbit to shade the Earth and make it look somewhat like Saturn and its rings; and notably, destroying all stratospheric ozone above the Arctic circle using a relatively small amount of a catalytic agent such as chlorine or bromine. Wexler was interested in both inadvertent climate modification, such as might be created by rocket exhaust gases or other pollution, and purposeful effects, whether peaceful or hostile. So remember it was Wexler, about 50 years ago, who first claimed climate control was “respectable.” Wexler died suddenly in 1962. Harry Wexler on Geoengineering and Ozone Destruction
A new horror weapon discovered a way as to affect the electrical behaviour of individuals’ own brain activity!
In 1976, A new weapon, the natural waveguide between the ionosphere and the Earth could be used to propagate very low frequency (VLF) radiation through it in such a way as to affect the electrical behaviour of individuals’ own brain activity
Global temperatures begin to rise in the early 60s
Thank you to Climate Viewer
Space Weather 2020
Front Page Headlines
The ionosphere, Van Allen belts, and upper atmospheric winds are invisible. Solution: Dump chemicals in space and suddenly the invisible can be studied: visibly with telescopes, optically with lasers, and electromagnetically heated with high-powered microwaves (ionospheric heaters) to modify space weather. Aluminium (TMA), Barium, Strontium, Sulfur Hexafluoride (SF6), and Lithium have been dumped in space to study and modify space weather for over sixty years and nobody knew. Harry Wexler warned in 1962 that rockets are burning holes in the ionosphere, destroying the ozone layer, and modifying weather on a global scale. The year following his death W. W. Kellogg from the RAND Corporation suggested expanding the use of sounding rockets to do just that: modify global weather. Wexler’s prescient work between 1958 and 1962 “On the Possibilities of Climate Control” reminds us that we are not the first generation to be involved with or concerned about geoengineering.
Wexler's warning.
“The subject of weather and climate control is now becoming respectable to talk about.” So began Harry Wexler in his speech “On the Possibilities of Climate Control,” given in early 1962 to technical audiences in Boston, Hartford, and Los Angeles. Wexler, who studied meteorology at MIT and served as Chief of Scientific Services at the US Weather Bureau, supported his claim by citing, among others, President John F. Kennedy’s recent speech at the United Nations proposing, “cooperative efforts between all nations in weather prediction and eventually in weather control” and the State Department’s urging of “early and comprehensive study in the light of developments in outer space of the possibility of large-scale weather modification.”
Wexler assured his audiences that he was concerned not with the long and the checkered history of cloud modification leading to more-or-less localized precipitation influences, but with planetary-scale manipulation of the Earth’s shortwave and longwave radiation budget that would result in “rather large-scale effects on the general circulation patterns in short or longer periods, even approaching that of climatic change.”
These effects, details later, included increasing world temperature by several degrees by 2 detonating up to ten H-bombs in the Arctic Ocean; decreasing world temperature by launching powder into an equatorial orbit to shade the Earth and make it look somewhat like Saturn and its rings; and notably, destroying all stratospheric ozone above the Arctic circle using a relatively small amount of a catalytic agent such as chlorine or bromine. Wexler was interested in both inadvertent climate modification, such as might be created by rocket exhaust gases or other pollution, and purposeful effects, whether peaceful or hostile. So remember it was Wexler, about 50 years ago, who first claimed climate control was “respectable.” Wexler died suddenly in 1962. Harry Wexler on Geoengineering and Ozone Destruction
A new horror weapon discovered a way as to affect the electrical behaviour of individuals’ own brain activity!
In 1976, A new weapon, the natural waveguide between the ionosphere and the Earth could be used to propagate very low frequency (VLF) radiation through it in such a way as to affect the electrical behaviour of individuals’ own brain activity
But perhaps the most exotic form of geophysical warfare concerns tampering with the electrical behaviour of the ionosphere. Techniques for disturbing radio communication by “punching holes” in the ionosphere with nuclear explosions have been long discussed. So, too, have proposals for opening up lethal windows in the ionosphere to let in the short-wavelength ultraviolet radiation which is known to damage biological systems, causing skin cancers in man and damage to crops. What is new, is the suggestion that the natural waveguide between the ionosphere and the Earth could be used to propagate very low frequency (VLF) radiation through it in such a way as to affect the electrical behaviour of individuals’ own brain activity.
New Scientist Magazine 1976
Weather Modification History
www.weathermodificationhis tory.com
New Scientist Magazine 1976
Weather Modification History
www.weathermodificationhis
Thank you to Climate Viewer
Space Weather 2020
Front Page Headlines
Interesting dot connection as there are several agendas behind the geoengineering project. The amount of material being sprayed in our skies by this project is not insignificant even compared to the amount of toxins left behind by rocket launches. David Keith, mad scientist director for the geoengineering project. He's on YouTube, one is a debate with Dane Wigington,and Keith says its estimated at 100 million tons of aluminum nano dust to be sprayed in our atmosphere. That is much more then rockets!
ReplyDeleteSunspots and sun activity are only causing us woes because, as you have noted here in this post, they punched big holes in our atmosphere! Thank you finally for clarifying that Gary. Yes there are times when geomagnetic solar storms have penetrated through a healthier than today atmosphere, but a rarity and not a consistent monthly pattern as we now experience. One clue in a broken atmosphere. Another clue, extreme heat during daylight hours then very cold evening time. Could mean no atmosphere. We see both of those now. Another clue is seeing northern lights - Aurora's much farther south and more frequently. Another thing we are seeing now. Be careful with supposed studies from NASA. We are being bombarded with propaganda to trick people in to following evil and to cover up what evil is doing. NASA had last week and other recent times, blacked out their greenhouse gas data, ice decline data, and basically most climate data for a few days straight. Hmmmm. NASA denies geoenginerring, so consider that with regards to this new sun finding. Just saying.....spin talk is truth twisted.
There was a mention of insects. Can you explain? I know they track migrations on radar.
ReplyDeleteAlso, I made a donation via Paypal. I thought the person was a different one than what the donate button lead me to.
LEFTIST ALERT!!!!
ReplyDelete“Climate change”, as everybody knows, is a leftist/globalist lie and a hoax, designed and perpetrated specifically to destroy your freedoms and separate you from your hard-earned money.
Great summary, Gary. Thank you for helping to get this info out into the open.
ReplyDeleteCan we even imagine what happens if all those thousands of 5G satellites are not only shuttled up, but also continuously radiate Earth's orbit incl. ionosphere? (aside from irradiating all live on Earth 24/7 for the sake of profit, greed and power hunger).
Modern man as s/he expresses him/herself in the last century has gone completely insane.
You are welcome
ReplyDeleteYes thank you Gary for some thorough investigation into decades of disastrous geo engineering. Again, man playing God for what we know has turned to evil intent, if not the original intent of weather warfare and human demise.
ReplyDeleteThe Jim Lee video is very important in realizing the documented history of the negative effects, existence of chemtrails, rocket bombs in the ionoshere! The fact that all of this chem cocktail falls into our breathing column, water, soil. This is evil science, self serving and diabolical.
all of this is creating climate change and extreme weather and not a hoax.
The everyday human consumption of fossils fuels and pollution pales in comparison to what the evil elite criminals are committing.
One glance at the displayed global temperature graph 1850-current casts doubt on this article. That graph clearly uses the fully manipulated and "adjusted" data currently put out by NOAA. They want us to believe that current temperatures are 1.5 degrees F WARMER than during the dust bowl 1930s.
ReplyDeleteThey want us to believe that temps in the 1910s and 1920s, which saw major melting of glaciers and of Arctic sea ice, were 3 degrees F COLDER than current.
Those claims are directly contradicted by all contemporaneous accounts from those periods. In the early 1920s, cargo ships and fishing boats were regularly sailing the summer Arctic ocean.
If the author had chosen to show us temp graphs of the same time periods using data BEFORE NASA/NOAA got into the game of corrupting the temperature record for political purposes, the graph would look quite different.
If you can find one, please send me a link Rick
ReplyDeleteEDIT: I miscalculated in my comment jsut now. It should read "1.8 degrees colder" not 3 degrees.
ReplyDeleteI would edit it myself, but I can't find it.
Here is chapter and verse on the subject.
ReplyDeletehttps://thsresearch.files.wordpress.com/2017/05/ef-gast-data-research-report-062717.pdf
Tony Heller has been comparing the NOAA published data and current media claims against contemporary accounts for years. Simply put, current data and accounts are contradicted by contemporary reporting.
Here's just one such video on the subject of the data record.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LRc_8Dtr2MM
Thanks
ReplyDelete